Most trusted Name in the NRI media
Serving over 22 millions NRIs worldwide


NRI's (Non Resident Indians) Work In United States, but Pay Tax In India

Mar 4th, 2005

Can you tax income which is otherwise not taxable in India? Well, trust PC indian FM to find a way to do that.

Normally, if employees are deputed to another country for a long period of time, they do not pay any tax in India on their salary income. Tax is payable by them against their salary income, including perquisites such as daily allowance, only in the other country under tax treaty laws. In other words, no tax is captured in India.

If the fringe benefit tax, as proposed in the Budget , is enacted, PC will be able to fill the coffers of the government treasury. India Inc will have to cough up fringe benefit tax on perquisites such as daily allowance paid to such employees. Thus, what India could once not tax because of treaty laws in the hands of the employee, will be captured indirectly by a tax on the Indian employer.

Let us take a concrete example using the Indo-US tax treaty as the base. Mr A is deputed by his employer XYZ Ltd, an Indian company, to work on-site in California. He has already spent more than three years in the US and will be working on the current project for over 183 days in the fiscal year. In short, Mr A is a resident of the US for tax purposes.

To avail of a short-stay exemption, where Mr A pays tax on his salary income only in India, three conditions need to be met. He should be in the US for a period of 183 days or less during a fiscal, the salary, including perks should be paid only by the Indian company, such salary should not be paid by a permanent establishment (such as a branch) in the US of such Indian company.

In this case, all three conditions are not met. No short stay exemption benefit is available and tax is payable by Mr A against his salary income in the US. Further, Mr A is a tax resident of the US and a non-resident in India.

Thus, he does not have to pay any tax in India against such salary income. Now, let us assume that Mr A gets a basic salary of $6,000 and a daily allowance of $3,000 per month.

XYZ Ltd will have to pay fringe benefit tax of 33.7%. Of course, the value against which the tax will be payable will differ from case to case. For instance, if, of the $3,000 per month, $2,000 goes towards boarding and lodging, then 20% of it would be the value for computing fringe benefit tax. XYZ Ltd will have to pay tax in India of 33.7% on $400, which works out to a fringe benefit tax of $135 per month (or nearly Rs 6,000 per month).

A quick glance at the per diem allowance paid across the software sector shows that the daily allowance hovers around $3,000 per month. A major component of this is for boarding and lodging. The ultimate fringe benefit tax payable by India Inc, including the software sector on such daily allowances could be a whopping figure.
Says Jairaj Purandare, senior partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers, "It must be remembered that the fringe benefit tax is not a tax on the employee but on the employer. Thus, what could not be captured earlier as tax in India, will be captured by taxing the employer." He feels this proposal will lead to a host of litigation, especially in a treaty scenario.

There could be another instance. Mr A could be a resident of India for tax purposes. He has been deputed to the US for a very short period of time. In this case, it is likely that the perquisite paid to him is taxable in his hands in India, both under the provisions of the Indian tax laws and the Indo-US tax treaty.

Says VN Srinivasa Rao, partner, Ernst & Young, "The fringe benefit tax does not take into consideration the residency of the employee. If the perquisite paid is one which falls into the categories defined as a fringe benefit, India Inc would have to pay the tax."

"But, the objective of this proposal is to bring into the tax ambit only those benefits that have not been captured in the hands of the employee. If Mr A, a tax resident of India pays tax in India on these benefits, as prescribed under Rule 3 of the Indian Income-tax Rules, then company XYZ could argue that it is not liable to pay fringe benefit tax," adds Mr Rao.

Both India Inc and international tax practitioners are currently awaiting clarity on this issue.

Source-The Economic Times-Dated 4-3-2005-LUBNA KABLY



Any comments on this article or you have any news: Click here

Disclaimer
NRIinternet.com will put up as many of your comments as possible but we cannot guarantee that all e-mails will be published. We reserve the right to edit comments that are published.