First-time director Shashi Kumar was inspired by the Gujarat riots
to retell the story of the victims of 1984 and the deep psychological
scars they bear.
NEW DELHI: July 29, 2004
FROM UTPAL BORPUJARI
DH NEWS SERVICE
Chand Bujh Gaya, a film based on the Gujarat riots, recently ran into
trouble with the Censor Board for depicting a character purportedly
based on Chief Minister Narendra Modi. Events post-Godhra have now inspired
a film that looks into the deep psychological and societal impact left
on the victims of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
Kaya Taran (Chrysalis), a Hindi film by first-time director and noted
television personality Shashi Kumar, attempts to dissect the minds of
those affected by the riots that occurred following Indira Gandhis
assassination in an adaptation of noted Malayalam author N S Madhavans
novel When Big Trees Fall.
The Rs 1.5-crore film, that was premiered in the capital recently by
the Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust, also offers a look into what Mr Kumar
calls increasing majoratarianism in both society and the
media.
I decided to make this film quite some time ago, but since the
story was set around the events of 1984, I asked myself why I needed
to (return to that time). But when the 2002 Gujarat riots happened,
I suddenly had the justification, Mr Kumar told Deccan Herald,
saying the humane aspect in communal violence was an important subject
at any time.
The films protagonist Preet, a journalist in Delhi and a victim
of the 1984 riots, goes to Meerut to do a story on religious conversion
just after the Gujarat riots. There he meets the nun who had saved him
and his mother from rioters 20 years ago by giving them shelter at a
nunnery.
Using a non-linear mode of storytelling and some surrealism, Kumars
film, that stars former Indian cricket skipper Bishen Singh Bedis
son Angad and actress Seema Biswas, raises disturbing issues
including why the media
has surreptitiously divided along political and communal
lines even as it tries to tackle what the director calls the
challenge to our countrys multiculturalism.
Majoratarianism is a big worry, especially when it starts coming
from unexpected quarters, like relatives and friends. The film is also
a kind of self-reflection on how the medias perspective has changed.
Today it is polarised and is about the Right, Hinduvta, the Left, and
so on. I tried to reflect upon the changing trends of the media also.
It is important because the media persuades people to behave in a particular
way, Mr Kumar says.
Right now the director, who hosted Doordarshans cultural show
Taana Baana and the economy-related programme Money
Matters, is in the process of entering his film in several international
film festivals while looking for a distributor for its release in India.
For me a theatrical release is very important, as it is not good
enough that it does the festival circuit. Because, however people may
react, I want them to watch the film because of the importance of the
subject, he says.
Interestingly, unlike recent films dealing with the issue of communalism,
such as Govind Nihalanis Dev, Kaya Taran takes a totally unsentimental
look at the sensitive subject.
I have always been a strong votary of anti-sentimentalism, because
I think the bane of good cinema is sentimentalism, Mr Kumar says.
Once you get dewy-eyed and lachrymose, it becomes a very predictable
experience.