Serving over 22 millions NRIs worldwide
Most trusted Name in the NRI media
We never stop working for you, NRI PEOPLE- OUR NETWORK
 
Marriage

File;1011

Australian NRI woman uses Indian Laws to harass a husband
and then uses Australian laws to get a divorce

We had some differences due to interference of my mother-in-law and some conflicts regarding immigration to Australia.

Prameet Narula, Pune, India
EMAIL: prameet_narula@yahoo.com

Name of this Article: Wife's Apathy Ruins Prameet's Life...

Regarding lodging of false F.I.R. and then extortionist tactics aided by Punjabi Bagh Police, New Delhi. This is how my wife (Jassi) screwed my ass.

I (Prameet Singh Narula s/o Late S. Pritam Singh Narula) was married to Ms. Jaspreet Kaur d/o S. Jaswinder Singh on 13th Oct 2002. Thereafter, we were staying at C-52, Sector-39, Noida. We had some differences due to interference of my mother-in-law and some conflicts regarding immigration to Australia.
I along with my wife had filed a mutual divorce petition on 14thMay, 2004 on grounds of “social and temperamental differences”. I am mentioning the details in brief. First Motion was listed to be on 2nd June, 04. However Hon’ble Judge was on leave that day.
On that night itself, I received 3 phone calls (details attached along with) from their house, which indicated some altercation happening at their house. My Mother-in-law, Ms. Lovejeet Kaur allegedly committed suicide on 3rd June, 04 by burning herself at her marital home in the presence of her husband S. Jaswinder Singh.

100% burn injuries were caused to my mother-in-law in presence of the husband and S.O.C. (Site of Crime) was disturbed. This circumstantial evidence is clearly indicative that something major (possibly an altercation between husband and wife) happened in their own house.

On 3rd June, 04, police (A.S.I. Jai Bhagwan) interrogated her husband S. Jaswinder Singh and he stated, " she was sick and suffering from depression". Also the statements of S.Daljit Singh (my wife’s mama) and Kamljot Singh (my wife’s brother) were recorded on the same day. Daljit Singh safeguarded Jaswinder Singh by saying that “her sister was sick and suffering from depression”. After recording these and other statements, A.S.I. Jai Bhagwan went back to Police Station and wrote D.D. No. 19a in case diary stating that Ms. Lovejeet Kaur had committed suicide and the reason was “she was suffering from depression”.

After 7 days, his daughter along with police (A.S.I Jai Bhagwan) filed an FIR against me that her mother committed suicide due to me and lodged a criminal case under Section 306 IPC.
Thereafter Punjabi Bagh police along with Jaswinder Singh started using extortionist tactics and started demanding money (4.2 lacs).

Following this, I approached H’ble High Court with the writ petition 1259/2004 in Oct, 2004:
--Hon’ble High Court stayed the investigation and asked the IO to be present and asked Ms. Jaspreet Kaur to file a reply.
---When the case was listed on 18th April, 05, Punjabi Bagh Police submitted the status report whereby submiiting the letter in which S. Jaswinder Singh had asked for an additional Rs. 4.2 lacs from the maternal uncle of Prameet. Following this submission, Hon’ble High Court asked for further investigation, with no coercive action against me and also asked Ms. Jaspreet Kaur and her father to be present on the next hearing.
---On 15th July, Punjabi Bagh Police submitted no status report, and they never accepted the existence of D.D. No. 19a, which was mentioned by me in my writ petition. On 15th July, case was listed for final disposal on 4th of October.
---On 4th of October since the case was listed for final disposal, fearing quashing of F..I.R. statements of S. Jaswinder Singh’s relatives and neighbors were recorded on 22nd September and a status report was submitted by Punjabi Bagh Police station stating that “Chargesheet is under scrutiny with the prosecution bench”. Following this submission of status report, Hon’ble High Court stated, “Since Chargesheet is under scrutiny, this petition is dismissed. Interim Orders (No Coercive action against petitioner) to continue until the charge sheet is filed.”Punjabi Bagh Police in their entire proceedings did not bring into the light the existence of D.D. No. 19a and were able to successfully befool the Hon’ble High Court and got my petition dismissed.

On Further investigation S.I. Mukesh Kumar filed a charge sheet against me on 18.11.2005 S.I. Mukesh Kumar investigated the case with malafide intentions and did not mention the D.D. Entry No. 19a wherein it was mentioned that “Lovejeet Kaur was sick and suffering from depression” dated 3rd June, 2004. By hiding these facts, Punjabi Bagh Police has also successfully befooled the judiciary.

Then, Right To Information came in Oct, 2005. As per the RTI, 05, we demanded a certified copy of D.D. No. 19a, and finally we got it too. Now my question to Punjabi Bagh Police is why were they hiding this critical information from the judiciary. Since, RTI is the new law, in past also Police would have befooled the judiciary because judiciary always believes what is portrayed to it. In this context, how the investigation of police can be believed since police is not able to give in the documents present in the police station itself.
I would like you to please go through the attached documents (which also includes the series of SMS messages written to me by my wife from time-to-time) and highlight that how a case u/s 306 IPC was registered. I am not saying that I’m innocent (as everyone says that) I just want to highlight the circumstances in which the F.I.R. was registered and the subsequent investigation carried on. This whole story is not only unbelievable but hilarious too.

She filed divorce on the grounds of cruely, but was dismissed twice due to her non-appearance. She then moved to Australia without intimating the local Indian Courts and applied divorce from there. No, sh is not appearing in the dates for the case u/s 306 IPC registered against me, and the trial against me is continuing in the Sessions Court.
This is an amazing story where a woman uses Indian Laws to harass a husband and then uses Australian laws to get a divorce which was not granted in India. Is there any means by which the Indian Judicial System can bring the women of these type to justice.
If you know of any way, please mail me at prameet_narula@yahoo.com


Our Opinion: First of all Jaspreet Kaur should not enter FIR against husband. Secondly, Prameet Singh Narula must understand that his mother-in-law allegedly committed suicide on 3rd June, 04 only after 20 days of his divorce petition file on May 14, 2004. Keep in mind most of women cannot tolerate this pain because of culture pressure. It is easy for men just divorce and married again.

Parmeet said, "we had some differences due to interference of my mother-in-law and some conflicts regarding immigration to Australia."

  • Majority of the mothers never interfere with son-in-law's life, but if she did, Parmeet should sit with his wife, convince her and not to file a divorce.
  • Now your wife lost her husband and as well as her mother because of you. She feels that you must get punishment to heal her wounds.

Gary Singh